Futures

[TheTrader99]

Feeder Cattle: A Bullish Breakout or a Technical Trap?​

Feeder cattle futures (March) have successfully tested the critical pivot pocket at **353.00-354.00**, bouncing defiantly in yesterday’s trade. This defense of key support signals a potential resurgence for the bull camp, but the fundamental landscape remains a complex tapestry of geopolitical friction, tightening biology, and technological disruption. A break above resistance at **358.75-359.40** could trigger a significant upside breakout, yet the market remains fragile.

Geopolitics & Geostrategy: The Border Bottleneck​

The "wildcard" for 2026 remains the US-Mexico border. Geostrategic trade talks are currently stalled over sanitary protocols, specifically regarding the New World screwworm threat.

Trade Flows: Delayed Mexican feeder cattle imports are artificially tightening US feedlot inventories. Any diplomatic breakthrough allowing the resumed flow would immediately dampen domestic prices.

• Global Competition: Brazil continues to dominate global beef exports, leveraging currency advantages. However, potential US tariffs on Brazilian beef (a rising protectionist trend) could further insulate US domestic prices, effectively putting a floor under feeder cattle values.

Industry Trends & Biological Reality​

The US cattle herd sits at its lowest level since the 1950s. Despite high prices, aggressive heifer retention has not yet materialized.

• Liquidation Mode: High interest rates and drought legacy have forced producers to liquidate rather than rebuild. This "biological lag" guarantees tight supplies through Q3 2026.
• Feed Spreads: Corn prices remain the primary inverse correlate. With 2026 harvest projections looking favorable, lower feed costs could incentivize feedlots to bid up feeder cattle, adding fuel to the current rally.

Technology & Science: The Precision Revolution​

The cattle industry is undergoing a silent high-tech overhaul, shifting from traditional ranching to Precision Livestock Farming (PLF).

• Innovation: Virtual fencing and GPS-enabled collars are optimizing grazing patterns, allowing producers to increase stocking rates on marginal land.
• Patent Analysis: A surge in patents for "biometric intake monitoring" suggests a future where individual animal efficiency is tracked in real-time, allowing buyers to pay premiums for high-performing genetic lines rather than just weight.

Cyber & Security: The Data Risk​

As ranches digitize, cybersecurity becomes a tangible risk.
Vulnerability: Automated feeding systems and cloud-based genetic databases are new attack vectors. A ransomware attack on a major packer or feedlot integrator could cause immediate, volatility-inducing disruptions in the futures market.

Macroeconomics & Consumer Resilience​

The macroeconomic backdrop is surprisingly supportive.

1. Economics: Despite inflationary pressures, the US consumer has shown inelastic demand for beef. High retail prices ($8.50+/lb) have not destroyed demand, emboldening packers to maintain slaughter rates.
2. Business Models: We are seeing a shift toward "captive supply" agreements. The Packers are bypassing the cash market to secure cattle directly from large producers, reducing liquidity in the spot market and making futures contracts more volatile.

Technical Analysis & Market Outlook
The technicals align with the fundamental tightness. The bounce off **353.00-354.00** confirms the uptrend.

• Bullish Case: A close above 360.85 validates the supply squeeze, opening the door for a run toward historic highs.
• Bearish Trigger: A failure to hold 353.00 would suggest that economic headwinds are finally curbing feedlot demand, neutralizing the uptrend.

Conclusion
The feeder cattle market is coiled. While geopolitical risks loom, the undeniable reality of a shrinking herd supports the bullish thesis. Investors should watch the 358.75 resistance level closely; a breach there signals that the market has fully priced in the scarcity of 2026.

 

[TheTrader99]

Soybean Meal Surge: Market Analysis & Trade Setups​

Market Momentum: The Bulls Take Charge​

Soybean meal futures display renewed strength. Prices for the March contract (ZMH26) rebounded significantly from early January lows. This upward movement signals a shift in market sentiment. Bulls now control the immediate trend, driven by both technical signals and fundamental demand. Traders must recognize this critical pivot point in the grain markets.

Geopolitics: The China Factor​

Global strategy drives commodity prices. China recently pledged to increase purchases of U.S. agricultural products. Data confirms they are honoring this commitment. This geopolitical alignment acts as a floor for soybean prices. Beijing’s focus on food security directly supports the demand side of the equation. This strategic buying counters bearish pressures from other global economic sectors.

Macroeconomics & Industry Trends​

Inflationary pressures continue to impact agricultural inputs. However, demand for livestock feed remains robust. Soybean meal is the primary protein source for global livestock. As emerging markets consume more meat, the "protein gap" widens. This structural demand keeps the industry resilient despite broader economic volatility. Supply chains are adapting to these new consumption patterns efficiently.

Innovation & AgTech Science​

Technology shields the sector from total volatility. Patent analysis shows a surge in drought-resistant seed technologies. These innovations ensure consistent supply baselines, preventing catastrophic shortages. Furthermore, digital farming and cyber-secure supply chains optimize logistics. These advancements allow the market to focus on demand-driven rallies rather than supply-shock fears.

Technical Analysis: The Buy Signal​

The technical setup confirms the fundamental thesis.

• MACD Indicator: The Moving Average Convergence Divergence is bullish. The blue line crossed above the red trigger line. Both trend upward.
• Seasonality: Historical data favors bullish moves in February and March.
• Key Resistance: The critical level to watch is $305.00.

 

[TheTrader99]

Soy Oil Surge: Geopolitics & B50 Mandate Impact​

Malaysian palm oil futures surged nearly 1% on January 13, triggering a bullish breakout in U.S. soybean oil.​

This rally drove prices to a five-week high on China's Dalian Commodity Exchange and the Chicago Board of Trade. Crucially, U.S. soybean oil futures crossed above the 200-day moving average a significant technical milestone. This is not merely a daily fluctuation; it represents a convergence of geopolitical strategy, industrial innovation, and macroeconomic shifts. The market is signaling a structural change in edible oil dynamics, driven by aggressive biofuel mandates and renewed Asian demand.

Geopolitics & Geostrategy: The Supply Shock​

The primary driver of this price action is Malaysia’s strategic shift toward energy independence. Malaysia, a top global supplier, is creating uncertainty with its aggressive B50 biodiesel mandate. By legally requiring a 50% palm oil blend in domestic diesel, Malaysia effectively removes millions of tons of supply from the global export market. This is a geostrategic move to insulate its economy from fossil fuel volatility. Consequently, importers like India must pivot to the closest substitute: U.S. soybean oil. India’s buying interest has already strengthened significantly in January after hitting an eight-month low in December.

Industry Trends & Technology: The B50 Challenge​

The shift to B50 is not just policy; it is a technological feat. Historically, high biodiesel blends caused engine corrosion and viscosity issues in colder climates. However, recent advancements in transesterification and catalyst efficiency have made higher blends viable. The industry is seeing a rise in patent filings related to cold-flow improvers and high-stability additives. These scientific breakthroughs empower Malaysia to enforce the mandate without crippling its logistics sector. As technology solves the B50 technical hurdles, the supply of palm oil for food will permanently decrease, forcing food manufacturers to adopt soybean oil.

Macroeconomics & Business Models​

Global trade flows are realigning. China is the wildcard; the market awaits key data this week regarding its edible oil purchases. If China follows India’s lead and ramps up buying, the current supply chain models optimized for cheap palm oil will break. Leadership in multinational food corporations must immediately hedge against this structural inflation. The "Just-in-Time" inventory model is dangerous in this environment. Forward-thinking management teams are already locking in long-term contracts for soybean oil, anticipating that the "palm oil discount" is a thing of the past.

Conclusion​

The convergence of Malaysia's energy policy, India's food security anxiety, and technical breakouts creates a high-probability upside for soybean oil. The B50 mandate is the catalyst that changes the supply equation permanently. Investors must recognize that this is no longer just a commodities trade; it is a bet on the future of renewable energy technology and global trade realignment.

---

 

[TheTrader99]

Crude Oil Surges: War Drums Drown Out Bearish Data​

Crude oil prices defied bearish inventory data this week, climbing to a 2.5-month high. Traders are ignoring the fundamental supply glut in favor of mounting geopolitical fear. February WTI crude (CLG26) settled up +1.42%, driven by escalating conflicts in the Middle East and Eastern Europe. The market is effectively pricing in a significant "war premium" despite signs of a looming surplus.

The Iranian Powder Keg​

Geostrategy is currently the primary driver of oil valuation. Mass protests in Iran have triggered a violent government crackdown, destabilizing OPEC’s fourth-largest producer. President Trump has explicitly warned of military options, briefing commanders on potential strikes if violence against protesters continues.

Reports indicate US personnel are evacuating the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, signaling potential escalation. Iran produces over 3 million barrels per day (bpd). Any US military strike or internal regime collapse could sever this supply instantly. This fear overrides standard economic metrics.

Drone Warfare and Supply Chains​

Modern warfare technology is fundamentally altering energy security. Ukrainian drone attacks have struck at least 28 Russian refineries recently, physically degrading Russia's export capacity. New attacks on tankers in the Baltic Sea and the Caspian Pipeline Consortium terminal further restrict flows.

These low-cost, high-tech drone strikes are creating a symmetric threat to asymmetric infrastructure. They force markets to calculate a permanent risk discount on Russian output. The physical disruption of supply lines is no longer theoretical; it is visible in reduced terminal loadings.

The China Factor vs. The Global Glut​

Macroeconomic signals remain deeply conflicted. On one side, the International Energy Agency (IEA) projects a massive 3.8 million bpd global surplus for 2026. US crude inventories unexpectedly rose by 3.39 million barrels last week, a typically bearish signal.

However, Chinese demand is acting as a powerful floor for prices. Beijing is aggressively rebuilding strategic reserves, with December imports set to rise 10% to a record 12.2 million bpd. This fierce demand from the world’s largest importer is actively absorbing the excess supply that Western analysts fear.

US Shale: Efficiency Over Volume​

The US energy sector demonstrates resilience through technological innovation rather than raw expansion. While active rig counts hover near multi-year lows (409 rigs), production remains near record highs at 13.75 million bpd.

High-tech drilling techniques and AI-driven reservoir management allow firms to extract more oil with fewer rigs. This efficiency disconnects production levels from traditional rig count metrics. US producers are maximizing free cash flow, refusing to flood the market despite the high prices.

Conclusion​

Oil markets are currently caught between a bearish reality and a bullish nightmare. Fundamentals point to a surplus, but the threat of supply shocks in Iran and Russia commands the price action. Until geopolitical tensions cool, volatility will remain the only certainty.

 

[TheTrader99]

Euro Stoxx 50 Plunges on Trump’s $108B Greenland Tariff Threat​

The Eurozone’s blue-chip benchmark faces a geopolitical shockwave as trade tensions escalate over Arctic sovereignty.​

The Euro Stoxx 50 Index is bracing for severe volatility following President Donald Trump’s ultimatum to impose punitive tariffs on eight European nations. The dispute, centered on Denmark’s refusal to sell Greenland, has morphed into a transatlantic trade crisis. Markets are reacting sharply to the threat of 10% duties escalating to 25% by June, on all goods from key economies, including Germany, France, and the Netherlands.

Geopolitics & Geostrategy: The Arctic Power Play​

The catalyst for this market disruption is geostrategic, not economic. Washington views Greenland as a critical asset for securing the GIUK Gap (Greenland-Iceland-UK) against Russian and Chinese influence. President Trump’s assertion that "China and Russia want Greenland" highlights the island's pivotal role in global security architecture. By leveraging trade policy to force a territorial acquisition, the U.S. has upended traditional diplomatic norms. Investors must now price in "sovereignty risk" alongside standard economic metrics.

Macroeconomics: The Cost of Retaliation​

The economic fallout threatens to derail the Eurozone’s fragile recovery. EU capitals are already drafting retaliatory measures targeting $107.71 billion in American products. A full-blown trade war would depress GDP growth across the bloc, with Germany’s export-heavy economy effectively in the crosshairs. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s comment that "Europeans project weakness" suggests the U.S. is unlikely to pivot, leaving the Euro Stoxx 50 exposed to prolonged macro-political headwinds.

Industry Trends: Luxury and Auto Sectors at Risk​

The index’s heavyweights face immediate downside pressure.

• Automotive: German giants like Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz rely heavily on the U.S. export market. A 25% tariff would obliterate margins and force supply chain restructuring.
• Luxury Goods: French conglomerates LVMH and Kering are highly sensitive to U.S. consumer sentiment. Tariffs would directly dampen demand for high-end European exports.
• Tech & Innovation: While companies like ASML and SAP are less dependent on physical goods tariffs, the broader economic chilling effect will weigh on capital expenditure forecasts.

Leadership & Legal Uncertainty​

The standoff reveals a clash of leadership styles that unnerves markets. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen’s declaration that "Europe will not be blackmailed" signals a unified, defiant EU front. Conversely, Trump’s reliance on a 1977 national emergency law to bypass standard trade protocols introduces legal unpredictability. With the U.S. Supreme Court yet to rule on the constitutionality of these sweeping duties, corporate strategists face a regulatory void.

Conclusion: A Volatile Outlook​

The Euro Stoxx 50 is no longer trading on fundamentals alone; it is trading on the probability of diplomatic failure. Until the Greenland impasse resolves, the index will remain a hostage to headline risk. Investors should prepare for a period where geopolitical posturing dictates asset valuations.

 

[TheTrader99]

Wheat 2026: Profit, Politics, and Tech​

Global wheat markets face a paradox in 2026. Production forecasts hit record highs, yet volatility remains the dominant theme. Traders must navigate a complex web of geopolitical shifts, technological disruption, and climatic upheaval. This analysis dissects the forces reshaping the world’s most critical grain.

Geopolitics and Geostrategy​

Food security now dictates national security strategies. China, the world’s largest producer, aggressively secures imports, projecting a rise of 2.7 MMT in 2025/26. This strategic stockpiling insulates them against domestic yield failures. Meanwhile, the Russia-Ukraine conflict proved how easily conflict disrupts supply chains. Russia’s agricultural emergency in grain-producing regions adds pressure. Nations utilize wheat as a diplomatic lever, forcing importers to diversify trade partners rapidly.

Macroeconomics and Economics​

Global forecasts project production at 808.6 MMT for 2025/26. However, this aggregate figure hides deep economic fissures. U.S. farmers face crushing margin compression. Prices hit five-year lows, forcing a pivot to higher-value crops like soy. Conversely, Russian producers struggle with state export duties. These economic disparities create localized supply shocks within a surplus global market. Inflationary pressures on inputs like fertilizer further squeeze profitability.

Science and Innovation​

Climate change fundamentally alters wheat biology. Scientific studies suggest higher CO2 levels essentially fertilize crops, boosting yields. Warming temperatures expand arable land into higher latitudes, potentially opening millions of square kilometers in Canada. However, heat stress creates a "goldilocks" problem. Excessive heat shortens growth cycles and curbs yields. Science now races to engineer seeds that survive these narrower thermal windows.

Technology and High-Tech​

Precision agriculture revolutionizes yield management. China’s push for food security relies heavily on drone usage and advanced data analytics. These tools optimize irrigation and nutrient delivery, mitigating the impact of erratic weather. High-tech farming transforms the field into a data-rich environment. Farmers utilize satellite imagery to predict harvest quality weeks in advance. This digital leap allows for rapid adaptation to shifting environmental baselines.

Patent Analysis and IP​

A war for intellectual property looms over the sector. Genetic modification (GM) and gene-editing represent the new frontier of agricultural IP. Argentina and Brazil recently approved GM wheat, challenging global norms. Patent holders for drought-resistant strains stand to gain immense market power. However, regulatory fragmentation persists. Japan and the EU remain cautious. This creates a dual-market risk where IP-protected GM wheat faces export barriers.

Industry Trends and Business Models​

Market participants increasingly financialize weather risks. Derivatives exchanges report a surge in Hard Red Spring Wheat futures, with massive trading volumes recently. This trend signals a shift in business models. Producers no longer just grow crops; they actively manage financial derivatives to hedge against climate volatility. Supply chains are shortening to reduce exposure to global logistics bottlenecks.

Cyber Security​

The digitization of farming introduces new systemic risks. Automated irrigation systems and drone fleets create vulnerable attack vectors. Malicious actors could theoretically disrupt national food supplies by hacking agri-tech infrastructure. As farms become networked enterprises, cyber defense becomes as critical as pest control. Protecting proprietary yield data and operational tech stacks is now a board-level priority for large agribusinesses.

Management and Leadership​

Successful agribusiness leadership demands agility. Managers must pivot quickly between crop varieties based on short-term climate models. The U.S. Northern Great Plains exemplifies this shift. Leaders there aggressively substitute wheat for corn when margins dip. This requires a culture of flexibility. Traditional, rigid planting schedules no longer guarantee profit. Modern leadership prioritizes data-driven decision-making over historical precedent.

Conclusion​

The wheat market of 2026 defies simple categorization. Record production coexists with high volatility. Geopolitical maneuvering and climate stress drive prices as much as supply and demand. Technology offers solutions but introduces new risks. Investors and stakeholders must view wheat not just as a commodity, but as a high-tech, strategic asset class.

 

[TheTrader99]

Platinum Jewelry 2026: Demand, Innovation & Risk​

Global platinum jewelry demand faces a pivotal correction in 2026. After a robust 7% surge in 2025, the market prepares for a 6% contraction. Traders must navigate a complex landscape defined by shifting tax regimes, technological disruption, and geopolitical friction. This analysis dissects the forces reshaping the prestige metal market.

Geopolitics and Geostrategy​

Political maneuvers directly dictate regional flows. Indian demand faces severe headwinds due to new U.S. tariffs on jewelry exports. These trade barriers are projected to slash India's fabrication numbers by 15% in 2026. Simultaneously, the "Greenland Crisis" and US-Europe tensions drive investors toward hard assets, influencing platinum’s perceived value. China’s strategic inventory stocking in 2025, driven by geopolitical anxiety, created an artificial high that now necessitates a correction.

Macroeconomics and Economics​

Price arbitrage remains the dominant economic driver. Platinum’s significant price discount relative to gold fueled the 2025 recovery, pushing demand to a seven-year high. However, China’s recent Value Added Tax (VAT) overhaul introduces volatility. The removal of VAT exemptions on imports increases costs, potentially dampening short-term consumption. Conversely, if gold faces steeper tax burdens, the widening price differential could ironically bolster platinum’s appeal as a cost-effective luxury alternative.

Industry Trends and Consumer Culture​

The "Quiet Luxury" movement supports platinum’s aesthetic. Consumers increasingly favor the metal's natural whiteness and density over flashy, plated white gold. In North America, demand grew 5% as buyers prioritized bridal and high-end segments. However, the market is maturing. The forecast indicates a 1% CAGR through 2029, suggesting a shift from rapid expansion to stable consolidation. Fashion trends now favor "experience-driven" purchases, where the metal's purity (95%) aligns with consumer demands for authenticity.

Technology and High-Tech​

Fabrication technology is revolutionizing jewelry design. Innovations like Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) now create platinum castings that are denser and internally flawless. This aerospace-grade tech eliminates porosity, a historical challenge in working with platinum. Furthermore, 3D printing advancements allow for complex, lightweight lattice structures previously impossible to cast. These technologies lower production costs and enable bolder, volume-heavy designs that appeal to modern consumers without the weight penalty.

Science and Patent Analysis​

Material science is expanding platinum's commercial viability. Recent patent filings highlight AI-designed specialty alloys, such as "Inoveo Platinum." These new materials are harder than standard alloys yet possess the workability of white gold. This scientific breakthrough lowers the barrier to entry for jewelers who previously lacked the specialized tools to work with high-melting-point metals. Such innovations are crucial for sustaining demand in non-bridal fashion categories.

Cyber Security​

Digital threats loom over the physical supply chain. As mining operations digitize, they become vulnerable to ransomware attacks. Recent incidents involving major producers like Sibanye-Stillwater highlight the fragility of raw material availability. A successful cyberattack on a major refiner could spike volatility, disrupting the delicate price equilibrium that jewelry fabricators rely on to maintain margins.

Conclusion​

The 2026 outlook for platinum jewelry is one of recalibration. The 6% contraction is not a collapse but a normalization after the 2025 inventory boom. Long-term stability relies on technological adoption and the metal's persistent value proposition against gold. Investors should view platinum not just as a commodity, but as a luxury asset class currently undergoing a high-tech industrial evolution.

 

[TheTrader99]

Canola Futures: The Biofuel Proxy Trade of 2026​

Canola Futures (ICE: RS) are emerging as the primary hedge against Europe’s unfolding energy crisis. A massive feedstock supply crunch in the European Union has upended the biofuels market. Regulatory bottlenecks and trade wars are choking off imports of waste oils from Asia. As European producers scramble for alternatives, North American Canola is poised to capture the overflow demand.

Geopolitics and Geostrategy​

The European Union has unintentionally weaponized its own bureaucracy. The implementation of the Union Database (UDB) created a digital blockade against imported Used Cooking Oil (UCO). Asian exporters, specifically in China, struggle to register their collection points within this new system. Consequently, the EU supply chain is severing ties with Chinese suppliers to avoid compliance risks. This geopolitical friction removes a massive volume of feedstock from the market, forcing Europe to look inward.

Science: The "Genetic Twin" Explained​

Investors must understand the biological reality: Canola is Rapeseed. The name "Canola" stands for "Canada Oil Low Acid." In the 1970s, scientists used traditional breeding to remove erucic acid from the Rapeseed plant. This created a food-grade version of the crop. However, for industrial purposes like biodiesel production, they are chemically nearly identical. They share the same high oil content and cold-weather performance properties. Therefore, a shortage of industrial Rapeseed in Europe mathematically equals a shortage of Canola globally.

Industry Trends and Arbitrage​

The "Genetic Twin" status creates a perfect arbitrage opportunity. European Rapeseed Oil (RSO) usually trades at a premium to Canola. As the UDB crisis restricts waste oil availability, European demand for RSO is skyrocketing. This widens the spread between Paris-based Rapeseed futures and Canadian Canola futures. Global buyers, priced out of the European market, will aggressively pivot to Canadian Canola. The markets are tethered; when one surges, the other follows.

Business Models and Supply Chain​

Major crushers like Bunge and ADM utilize this substitutability to protect margins. Their business model relies on "crush spreads," the difference between the cost of the seed and the value of the oil. With European crushing capacity desperate for compliant feedstock, North American exporters gain pricing power. They are the only stable source of genetically compatible, high-oil-content seed that meets strict Western regulatory standards.

Technology and Cyber Security​

The current crisis is a data failure, not a crop failure. The Union Database acts as a cybersecurity gatekeeper for physical trade. It requires digital traceability for every liter of oil. Because the Asian supply chain lacks this digital infrastructure, the physical oil is "locked out." This highlights a new high-tech reality: commodity availability now depends on software compliance as much as harvest yields.

Macroeconomics and Economics​

The feedstock crunch is inflationary for the energy sector. Biofuel mandates in Europe are legally binding; refiners must blend renewable fuels. If cheap waste oil is unavailable, they must buy expensive crop-based oil. This inelastic demand curve forces prices higher regardless of the broader economic slowdown. Canola futures benefit from this regulatory inflation, decoupling from other agricultural commodities that rely solely on food demand.

Conclusion​

The trade thesis for 2026 is simple: Europe is short on oil, and Canada has the reserves. The regulatory hurdles of the UDB are unlikely to be resolved quickly. Until they do, Canola Futures on ICE Futures U.S. serve as the most liquid, accessible proxy for the European biodiesel squeeze. Investors should view Canola not just as a grain, but as a critical energy asset.

 

[TheTrader99]

Silver Futures at $100: Breakout Analysis​

Market Trends and Fundamentals​

Silver Futures have finally breached the historic $100 threshold after years of anticipation. This represents a truly exceptional event in the commodities market. The current momentum is breathtaking. Market fundamentals remain highly favorable for the metal. Catalysts predicted in recent analyses are now actively playing out. Furthermore, many additional catalysts remain to be activated, supporting the ongoing rally.

Technical Analysis and Forecasting​

Current forecasting models suggest further upside potential. The Fibonacci extension tool currently points to a target of $120. This projection methodology aligns with forecasting techniques used for previous major market tops. The rally to $120 might seem extreme, but $100 also appeared unlikely just months ago. This technical data suggests the near-term rally could extend significantly.

Economic Correction Risks​

Investors must acknowledge that no market moves up without periodic corrections. A significant correction could eventually drive prices down to the $50 or $60 area. However, a drop below $50 seems unlikely in our lifetimes once this floor is established. Any decline below that level would likely be very brief.

Investor Psychology and Behavior​

The $100 price point serves as an extremely important psychological round number. This valuation has been discussed repeatedly for decades. Consequently, many investors will likely seize this opportunity to take profits. Letting go of positions during the final part of an upswing is difficult. However, exiting during high momentum is often the wisest financial decision.

Historical Context​

Betting on higher prices carries significant risk. Gains can be erased in a flash. Market participants must remember the volatility and crash that occurred in 2011. Understanding this historical precedent is vital for navigating the current volatility.