Moving averages and resistence levels

[lucacrebbe]

Which methods are statistically more effective when trading combining moving averages and resistence levels?

 

[REB_FX]

100 and 200 cross or 'Golden cross' as it is referred to.

 

[Jack Guill]

Moving averages may likewise be utilized as unique indicators of areas of support and resistance. As moving averages themselves change after some time as price changes, these levels of support and resistance likewise emulate their example – similar to they're playing tag! Since these levels are changing constantly, they're 'dynamic'. We can utilize these floaters in trading. On the off chance that the trend is up, price will for the most part be over the moving average. So we buy when the price plunges and discovers support at the moving average. On the other hand, when the trend is down, you'll more often than not find that the price is beneath the average. So we sell when the price ascends to meet the resistance offered by the moving average.

 

[momo3HC]

100 and 200 cross or 'Golden cross' as it is referred to.

I`m using exactly 100 and 200 SMA now into my BTC charting but just as a support to other main factors.

 

[Petez_FX]

I use EMA 28 50 100 200, I only use them as confluences though. if the EMA's match up to Trendlines, Fibs, and S&R - it would be another reason to take the trade.

 

[momo3HC]

I use EMA 28 50 100 200, I only use them as confluences though. if the EMA's match up to Trendlines, Fibs, and S&R - it would be another reason to take the trade.

Sure MA`s couldn`t be used as a single signal provider.